Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battle of Westmark"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Dude, stop posting false information, leave my post and if you have any problems with it, send for some GMs and LTs and we can all discuss this. | Dude, stop posting false information, leave my post and if you have any problems with it, send for some GMs and LTs and we can all discuss this. | ||
: I'll tell you again what I told you before. All the information that I've posted on all the articles that I've made are true and can be backed by facts. The only issue at hand is whether or not this battle was part of the Riga War, which it was not. My reasoning for saying so is because you called in foreign allies in RP (orcs, dreadlanders, dwarves) and they fought with you, while our side has other Imperial aligned players fighting with us on their Imperial characters (wood elves and nauzicans, etc). This battle falls under the Krajian Rebellion portion of the wiki, which I will be working on after the 18 years' war and the Riga war are completed. If you've any further arguments, please leave them below and I'll respond to them to the best of my ability. I hope someone from the wiki team monitors this conversation so that, should this talk page come to incessant rambling with no progress, one can make a decision and end our debate. I would also propose that no work be done on this page or on the [[Riga War]] page until we've come to a decision here. -- [[User:Pureimp|Pureimp]] | : I'll tell you again what I told you before. All the information that I've posted on all the articles that I've made are true and can be backed by facts. The only issue at hand is whether or not this battle was part of the Riga War, which it was not. My reasoning for saying so is because you called in foreign allies in RP (orcs, dreadlanders, dwarves) and they fought with you, while our side has other Imperial aligned players fighting with us on their Imperial characters (wood elves and nauzicans, etc). This battle falls under the Krajian Rebellion portion of the wiki, which I will be working on after the 18 years' war and the Riga war are completed. If you've any further arguments, please leave them below and I'll respond to them to the best of my ability. I hope someone from the wiki team monitors this conversation so that, should this talk page come to incessant rambling with no progress, one can make a decision and end our debate. I would also propose that no work be done on this page or on the [[Riga War]] page until we've come to a decision here. -- [[User:Pureimp|Pureimp]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I will be monitoring the future editing revolving this debate and hopefully we can all reach a solution and a factual, unbias page for all to enjoy.--[[User:Yoppl|Yoppl]] ([[User talk:Yoppl|talk]]) 04:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:38, 4 January 2017
Folks use the talk page if you want to discuss something instead of continually undoing each other's edits. -- Destinator8 (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Also check out https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Talk_pages for talk page formatting -- Destinator8 (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Dude, stop posting false information, leave my post and if you have any problems with it, send for some GMs and LTs and we can all discuss this.
- I'll tell you again what I told you before. All the information that I've posted on all the articles that I've made are true and can be backed by facts. The only issue at hand is whether or not this battle was part of the Riga War, which it was not. My reasoning for saying so is because you called in foreign allies in RP (orcs, dreadlanders, dwarves) and they fought with you, while our side has other Imperial aligned players fighting with us on their Imperial characters (wood elves and nauzicans, etc). This battle falls under the Krajian Rebellion portion of the wiki, which I will be working on after the 18 years' war and the Riga war are completed. If you've any further arguments, please leave them below and I'll respond to them to the best of my ability. I hope someone from the wiki team monitors this conversation so that, should this talk page come to incessant rambling with no progress, one can make a decision and end our debate. I would also propose that no work be done on this page or on the Riga War page until we've come to a decision here. -- Pureimp
I will be monitoring the future editing revolving this debate and hopefully we can all reach a solution and a factual, unbias page for all to enjoy.--Yoppl (talk) 04:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
