Difference between revisions of "Talk:Joseph, King of Courland"

From Lord of the Craft
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 17047 by Legoboy (talk))
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The entire section is actually correct. The person playing the young count char was downed in pvp and he /d 40'd or was popped instantly. we asked him to return to continue rp however he claimed him /d40'ing was us killing him in rp which is completely unfair. We spoke with a gm to confirm this at the time -wapples.
 
The entire section is actually correct. The person playing the young count char was downed in pvp and he /d 40'd or was popped instantly. we asked him to return to continue rp however he claimed him /d40'ing was us killing him in rp which is completely unfair. We spoke with a gm to confirm this at the time -wapples.
 +
 +
wow wow calm down lego. this is a discussion page, don't undo what I've said.
 +
now you guys are claiming that seannie and the other guy ok'd? Right well both of them were killed in pvp, and both of them /d 40'd and refused to return to rp. They /don't/ decide if they died after pvp, rather we get to rp with them and either apprehend them or kill them. They robbed us of this chance, refused to return and said that they pk'd, creating a shitty rp story that we killed an 8 yr old kid. Now idgaf if they made some stupid rp post, they abused the rp situation, nobody killed them, they decided themselves that they would pk from pvp to make us look like the villains. That is why I made this rp section so that it is fair, you guys in ooc used the whole killing an 8yr old to you advantage in rp, however in rp it didn't happen so to make the most rp sense out of it I wrote that. I'm very happy for you guys to contribute in a useful way, however forcing rp on this page that didn't actually happen is not useful int he slighted. If you guys persist I can get gms involved to validate my position

Revision as of 00:11, 28 September 2017

The entire Greyspine Crisis part is horifically biased and at times incorrect..

The entire section is actually correct. The person playing the young count char was downed in pvp and he /d 40'd or was popped instantly. we asked him to return to continue rp however he claimed him /d40'ing was us killing him in rp which is completely unfair. We spoke with a gm to confirm this at the time -wapples.

wow wow calm down lego. this is a discussion page, don't undo what I've said. now you guys are claiming that seannie and the other guy ok'd? Right well both of them were killed in pvp, and both of them /d 40'd and refused to return to rp. They /don't/ decide if they died after pvp, rather we get to rp with them and either apprehend them or kill them. They robbed us of this chance, refused to return and said that they pk'd, creating a shitty rp story that we killed an 8 yr old kid. Now idgaf if they made some stupid rp post, they abused the rp situation, nobody killed them, they decided themselves that they would pk from pvp to make us look like the villains. That is why I made this rp section so that it is fair, you guys in ooc used the whole killing an 8yr old to you advantage in rp, however in rp it didn't happen so to make the most rp sense out of it I wrote that. I'm very happy for you guys to contribute in a useful way, however forcing rp on this page that didn't actually happen is not useful int he slighted. If you guys persist I can get gms involved to validate my position